\begin{frame}
\frametitle{Examples: Semantics Intuitive}
\begin{alertgoal}{}
Typical exam question.
\end{alertgoal}
\begin{exampleblock}{}
Which of the following semantic implications are true?
\begin{talign}
\text{\hint{(a)}}\quad\quad \myall{x}{\myex{y}{R(x,y)}} \;\;&\models\;\; \myex{x}{\myall{y}{R(x,y)}} \mpause[2]{\quad\quad \alert{NO}} \\
\text{\hint{(b)}}\quad\quad \myall{x}{\myex{y}{R(x,y)}} \;\;&\models\;\; \myex{y}{\myall{x}{R(x,y)}} \mpause{\quad\quad \alert{NO}} \\
\text{\hint{(c)}}\quad\quad \myex{y}{\myall{x}{R(x,y)}} \;\;&\models\;\; \myall{x}{\myex{y}{R(x,y)}} \mpause{\quad\quad \alert{YES}} \\
\text{\hint{(d)}}\quad\quad \myex{y}{\myall{x}{R(x,y)}} \;\;&\models\;\; \myall{y}{\myex{x}{R(x,y)}} \mpause{\quad\quad \alert{NO}}
\end{talign}
\pause
For the non-valid implications give counter-models.\\
(Models that make the premise true, the conclusion false.)
\begin{center}
\begin{tikzpicture}[node distance=15mm,
dot/.style={minimum size=4mm, circle, draw=none, fill=black, inner sep=0, outer sep=1mm, text=white}]
\mpause[1]{
\begin{scope}
\node at (-1.5,0) {\hint{(a)\mpause{, (b)}}};
\node [dot] (1) {1};
\node [dot,below right of=1] (2) {2};
\node [dot,above right of=2] (3) {3};
\begin{scope}[->,thick]
\draw (1) -- (2);
\draw (2) -- (3);
\draw (3) -- (1);
\end{scope}
\end{scope}
}
\mpause{}
\mpause{
\begin{scope}[xshift=50mm]
\node at (-1,0) {\hint{(d)}};
\node [dot] (1) {1};
\node [dot,below right of=1] (2) {2};
\node [dot,above right of=2] (3) {3};
\begin{scope}[->,thick]
\draw (1) -- (2);
\draw (3) -- (2);
\draw (2) to[out=-45,in=-45-90,looseness=5] (2);
\end{scope}
\end{scope}
}
\end{tikzpicture}
\end{center}\vspace{-2ex}
\pause\pause\pause\pause\pause
Thus only (c) is a valid semantic implication!
\end{exampleblock}
\end{frame}